8 minuten leestijd
We often see it: we buy a solution with enormous potential, but after a tremendously difficult project, we don’t see the potential being realized. It’s easy to blame the software, the project, or sometimes even the employees. But isn’t it the behavior or even the culture within the company that is the cause? Do we have the skills and behaviors necessary to truly extract the potential?
“Transforming” your company, that’s what many platforms claim. In the beginning of the project, the focus is often on simply implementing the data provision, the basic process. Once this Minimum Viable Product is up and running, larger implementations often experience fatigue within the organization due to the change. However, the transformation takes place afterward. Now the platform must lead to concrete changes and opportunities for further improvements must be found. This depends on the users themselves and the team around them. But are they capable of this? Often, we see that this group is not yet ready to actively engage in this process. As a result, the potential remains untapped. The team will continue with their daily routine as they always have. The result is that sometimes only the tool has changed, perhaps one step has been automated, but it cannot be called a transformation. Larmans’ Law of Organizational Behavior has already indicated that if the context does not concretely change, the organization will revert to its old behavior. Therefore, we must actively do something to change the context in such a way that a different outcome emerges. Otherwise, the potential will never be realized.
To achieve this, the team itself must be engaged in continuous improvement. Now that they have the platform, this should be possible, right? In the book “Turn the Ship Around,” David Marquet refers to a possible cause of failing to realize potential. He describes teams on submarines that were conditioned to work according to orders and not think for themselves. They were centrally controlled or waited for external input for change. The process or instruction was always followed, less and less thinking occurred, and initiative was punished. But the transition to team autonomy proved more challenging than expected. A truly autonomous team required not only autonomy but also more knowledge. To ensure that the team truly improves continuously and takes responsibility for this improvement, they must actively engage in their own change. Whether this is on a submarine or in an organization safe on land. If you don’t do this, every change or improvement will have to be externally driven, by management, a project, or a vendor. That is exhausting and costly.
But where do you start with this culture and behavior change? Begin with the following five focal points in your organization, and you will experience improvement quickly!
All the changes resulting from these focal points originate at the behavioral level. This cannot be achieved through a process, instruction, or agreement alone. Actively steer towards this, but give it time. It will change the culture within the company in a way that goes far beyond the impact delivered by the software alone. However, behavioral change takes time. It will take months for people to actively notice the tremendous strides that have been made.
Curious how you can implement this in your organization? Mark Your Progress is here to help you!